The Constitution, not political party

Print Article

Constitutional principles apply to both Democrats and Republicans.

LET'S SAY THE congressional committee's investigation is about the terrorist attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi.

And let's say then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton turned over some material to the committee and kept other things secret.

Then let's say the committee subpoenaed Clinton to appear for testimony and questioning and she was a no-show.

Finally, let's say President Barack Obama dismisses the whole thing as a "witch hunt" and asserts executive privilege to block access to evidence while telling everyone in his administration, past and present, they must defy subpoenas, refuse to testify or turn over any sought-after materials.

WOULD THE REPUBLICAN majority in Congress at the time have looked upon that as a constitutional collision?

The ugly truth is that today's politicians are incapable of acting on principle, even when that principle involves upholding the most cherished document in America, the United States Constitution.

Instead, all that matters is whether the administration being investigated has an "R" or a "D" attached to it.

There were plenty of serious issues deserving the deepest dive in the Benghazi attack. Republicans were right to press hard to get to the bottom of it. Democrats were wrong to circle the wagons and politicize the issue.

Likewise, there are clear justifications for post-Mueller hearings on Russia's election tampering and subsequent attempts to impede the federal investigation. The strategy that is emerging, with the Article II branch of government digging in to block Article I proceedings is an assault on constitutional separation of powers.

HERE'S WHERE THE argument usually turns toward "what-about-isms." As in, "What about Hillary Clinton's lies and obstructions and email servers" or whatever.

No objections. Republicans were right to push through all that, drive hard for the facts, and they did.

But whatever foot-dragging Clinton or Obama may have tried (and failed, by the way) does not justify barriers today. "What-about-isms" are just plain dumb. It's like trying to tell a cop he can't write you a speeding ticket because somebody passed you a mile back.

Congress has the constitutional authority and obligation to investigate and exercise oversight. That was true of the Benghazi probe. It was true of the Iran-Contra probe, and the Watergatge probe before that. And it's true today with Trump. Politicians do not take an oath to defend their party. They take an oath to defend the Constitution.

Print Article

Read More Editorials

Yes, it's legal; but is it right?

June 17, 2019 at 10:21 am | Here's the test: Would your side howl if it happened to them? AN OLD SAYING most folks have heard at one time or another: There's legal, and then there's right. We're reminded of that thought aft...

Comments

Read More

Life ought to work like that

June 17, 2019 at 10:21 am | Please, Mr. President, let's not go down that road again. LAST WEEK, in an interview with ABC News, President Trump responded to a question about how he'd handle a foreign entity offering dirt on ...

Comments

Read More

Good planning for legalized pot

June 10, 2019 at 10:15 am | Along the border, Illinois marijuana decision will pose many issues. THIS MAY BE the question of the year once Illinois fully legalizes recreational marijuana: Will there be a traffic jam solid on...

Comments

Read More

Time to find another space

June 03, 2019 at 10:05 am | South Beloit's City Park is an unreliable base for recreation. IT'S A TOUGH THING to acknowledge, but South Beloit's City Park probably should be surrendered to the vicissitues of Mother Nature. ...

Comments

Read More

Contact Us

(608) 365-8811
149 State Street
Beloit, WI 53511

©2019 Beloit Daily News Terms of Use Privacy Policy
X