Can the courts return balance?

Print Article

Founders intended to avoid an all-powerful presidency.

THERE'S LITTLE DOUBT the simmering struggle between President Trump and House Democrats ultimately will move to the federal courts. That could be a good thing for the American people.

Here's why. For most of the last century and all of this one the federal government has taken a dramatic turn away from the Founders' intent of a strong Congress - as the branch closest to the people - and a comparatively weaker executive.

It has happened under both Democrat and Republican control. And it hasn't necessarily occurred because power-mad presidents schemed to usurp the Article I authorities of Congress, but rather because a timid Congress failed to make decisions and willingly shifted power to the White House.

FOR EXAMPLE, the Constitution grants sole authority to Congress to declare war. For most living Americans peacetime has been seldom seen. Yet the last time America fought under a congressional declaration of war was WWII.

It is not an exaggeration to say multiple presidents, acting as commander in chief, have waged war wherever and whenever they wanted. Congress didn't declare it, Congress didn't stop it, Congress meekly went along.

Neither is Trump the first to defy congressional demands for information. Republicans sought more documents in the gun-running controversy known as "Fast and Furious," and held President Obama's then-attorney general Eric Holder in contempt for refusing to comply. Republicans, not surprisingly, cried foul over administration defiance. Now it's Democrats demanding information from Trump for oversight functions, and Democrats seething over non-compliance, while Republicans cheer the administration's refusal.

Likewise, the power of the purse - granted strictly to Congress in Article I - has become fully partisan. When President Trump, on his own authority, claimed the right to build a wall with money allocated by Congress for other purposes - after Congress specifically rejected funding the wall - Democrats objected and Republicans went along.

THAT'S WHAT HAS gone astray from the vision of the Founders, as set forth in the U.S. Constitution. And it has gone there because of blind partisanship.

Congress is paralyzed and unable to fulfill its constitutional duties because members view every matter strictly through a partisan lens, on both sides. Whether executive action is right or wrong depends solely on whether the White House occupant has an "R" or a "D" by his name. Congress largely has abdicated its constitutional role and surrendered its authority because members simply will not cross partisan lines to uphold Article I powers.

Remember, it didn't start when Trump took the oath of office. Congress has become increasingly servile to the White House over decades.

So we would welcome a monumental series of cases being brought to the U.S. Supreme Court to sort out Article I (legislative) and Article II (executive) powers.

The only worry is over finding out whether the Article III courts - in this modern, polarized era - have succumbed to the partisan virus. The question is whether the courts will set America back on the constitutional path as written by the Founders, or finish the job of making the Article II executive all-powerful.

Print Article

Read More Editorials

Most important educator for kids

September 16, 2019 at 9:53 am | As a new team takes the field, parents are still the key to success. EDUCATORS OFTEN REMIND non-educators that reading too much into school test scores should be avoided. Let's stipulate that last...


Read More

Capitol Report Elections Commission spokesman disputes claims

September 16, 2019 at 9:54 am | Wisconsin Elections Commission spokesman Reid Mangey is strongly disputing the notion that the practice of auditing election ballots by running them through vote tabulation devices is problematic. W...


Read More

Support markets for US farmers

September 09, 2019 at 9:59 am | Government causes the problems, then raids treasury for fixes. TIMES ARE TOUGH on America's farms these days and it's not all due to President Trump's ill-advised trade war with China, though losi...


Read More

A little jail time says it's serious

September 09, 2019 at 9:59 am | Relatively meaningless fines won't rein in digital excess. MOST PEOPLE, HEARING a company had been fined $170 million, likely would think, "Whew! That's a lot of money." Well, not necessarily. L...


Read More

Contact Us

(608) 365-8811
149 State Street
Beloit, WI 53511

©2019 Beloit Daily News Terms of Use Privacy Policy