Take another look at Foxconn

Print Article

Obviously, the deal is shaping up differently than Wisconsin expected.

THIS ONE SEEMS like a no-brainer: If Foxconn can change its plans away from what had been negotiated and promised with Wisconsin state government officials, then Wisconsin ought to be able to make adjustments, too.

Foxconn did not meet its target employment numbers for 2018, a shortfall that cost the Chinese company nearly $10 million in state incentives.

Then, last week, Foxconn announced a major change - reneging on its promise to create a workforce for manufacturing high-tech screens for televisions and other uses, instead planning to create a "technology hub" populated mostly with researchers. Foxconn said the switch was necessitated by market changes, and the company still plans to create 13,000 jobs eventually - jobs that are tied to up to $4 billion in taxpayer incentives.

MAYBE THEY WILL, maybe they won't. Just a few months in, Foxconn's wavering record provides ample reason to wonder if the company's word is good.

Mind you, we are not accusing Foxconn of maliciously pulling a bait-and-switch on Wisconsin taxpayers. It's too early for that. Market changes are real and can force companies to adjust on the fly. And, as former Gov. Scott Walker tweeted last week, tax incentives are structured in a way that Foxconn won't get them unless the company fulfills contractual obligations.

On the other hand, the whole project was sold on the basis of bringing back manufacturing to Wisconsin and America. That matters, too, particularly for blue-collar workers who had hoped for jobs.

Wisconsin's new governor, Tony Evers, ran for office in part on the claim that he didn't like certain elements of the Foxconn deal negotiated by his predecessor, Walker. Those in the deal's-a-deal camp wanted to block Evers from trying to reopen arrangements between Foxconn and the state. In our view, that argument now falls flat. If Foxconn isn't keeping its end of the bargain, why shouldn't Wisconsin put issues back on the table? Like, for example, environmentally sensitive waivers.

WISCONSIN WANTS GROWTH and Foxconn may still be a pretty good bet. Partners need to work well together and accommodate flexibility when it is called for and preserves benefits.

But that's a two-way street. Evers should be allowed a crack at the negotiating table.

Print Article

Read More Editorials

Better options for legal costs?

December 02, 2019 at 10:30 am | School district's trendline for legal fees is alarming. A QUICK LOOK on the Google machine finds multiple sources providing figures for how much lawyers in Wisconsin get paid annually. Undoubtedly...

Comments

Read More

At least both sides like trips

December 02, 2019 at 10:29 am | No doubt, citizens will benefit immensely from political tourism. WHO SAYS ELECTED members of the Wisconsin legislature can't get anything done? And who says they can't do anything in a bipartisa...

Comments

Read More

The proper forum is at the Capitol

November 25, 2019 at 9:19 am | WHAT IS KNOWN as "conversion therapy" is a highly controversial practice supposedly intended to change an individual's orientation, for example, changing someone from homosexual to heterosexual. Pro...

Comments

Read More

Avoid problems, embrace the law

November 25, 2019 at 9:20 am | SOMETIMES THIS SORT of thing is called an unforced error, or even a self-inflicted wound. We refer to mistakes made by the School District of Beloit for not observing - let alone failing to welcome ...

Comments

Read More

Contact Us

(608) 365-8811
149 State Street
Beloit, WI 53511

©2019 Beloit Daily News Terms of Use Privacy Policy
X