Council approves Casey's on Cranston - Beloit Daily News: News

608-365-8811
default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Council approves Casey's on Cranston

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Tuesday, April 2, 2013 4:00 pm

Beloit City councilors on Monday approved a conditional use permit to allow a Casey's General Store near the corner of Cranston and Shopiere roads.

Councilors voted 5-1-1 to approve the permit, which goes against the Plan Commission recommendation. Councilor Sheila DeForest voted against and councilor Dave Luebke abstained.

The conditional use permit allows Casey's to install eight gas pumps on the 2.8 acre lot at 2240 Cranston Road. Along with a 4,200 square-foot convenient store selling pizza, sandwiches along with beer and wine.

Brian DePrez, real estate and store development associate for Casey's, said the Iowa-based company has looked to come back to southern Wisconsin.

“I found four locations and brought it back to our executives,” he said. “This (lot) was at the top of their list. It's not often you find a vacant corner with 26,000 cars passing it on a daily basis.”

He said the store will employ 20 to 25 full and part time employees, but he didn’t know how many of each adding it would be the decision of the store manager.

During the agenda review committee councilors discussed changing the plan to move the convenient store building closer to Cranston Road and have the gas pumps in the back.

Part of the concern during the Plan Commission meeting was the original intent of the district neighborhood was to be office space.

“The suggestion to reverse your building and perhaps put some fake windows on the back side would in fact preserve the office-type streetscape,” said councilor Jim Van De Bogart.

DePrez said typically Casey's doesn't build the store with the back facing the busiest road, and didn't believe the company's executives would approve that type of layout.

DeForest said she voted against the plan because she believed the council should follow the original intent of the district.

David Francis, Denver, Colo. resident, who's mother owns the property, said the land has been for sale for nearly 30 years since his father and business partner bought it in the 1980s.

“It was always the intention to sell for commercial use,” Francis said.

Jerry Murphy, owner of the Murphy Wisch and Associates Funeral Home, 2355 Cranston Road, spoke out against the project and also cited the need to maintain the “vision the council had 25 years ago.”

Several other convenient business owners said letting Casey's into the neighborhood would negatively impact their business.

Council President Charles Haynes said it would essentially violate anti-trust laws to prevent Casey's from coming into the neighborhood based solely the impact of other businesses.

Ryan Swanson, engineering consultant for Casey's, said the company planned to use LED lights to minimize the light that would spread to disrupt local residents.

“It's a more subdued and it's not as bright as some of the older gas stations that are around,” he said.

DePrez said Casey's would like to start building this year, adding it would take about three to four months to complete the project once it started.

“If we get into say November it might be difficult to start then,” he said. “But we would like to start this year.”

More about

More about

More about

  • Discuss

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.

5 comments:

  • billtinder posted at 11:31 am on Thu, Apr 4, 2013.

    billtinder Posts: 4908

    It would appear that the assessment by Luckydog was premature. I guess all that hysteria got his hackles up![beam]

     
  • Mike_Zoril posted at 7:15 am on Thu, Apr 4, 2013.

    Mike_Zoril Posts: 2898

    I believe the council made the right decision and I agree with comments from BeloitGuy and Mentor397. Despite the right decision being made, this is another example of red tape businesses need to deal with to create jobs in Beloit. Sometimes you can cut through that red tape and other times you can't. Some red tape is understandably necessary, but when you look at the bigger picture, there is still too much of it.

     
  • BeloitGuy posted at 8:01 am on Wed, Apr 3, 2013.

    BeloitGuy Posts: 118

    I'm curious why Dave Luebke abstained from voting. It seems a fairly obvious question. Though we differ in our general political views, I've always found Dave an honest, genuine guy.

    As for Sheila, I sincerely doubt the original intent was to have the land vacant after 30 years. With the possible exception of the number of people on the city payroll, Beloit has not grown appreciably for more than 30 years. It's not entirely Beloit's fault as there has been an overall shift away from the upper central portion of the country to the south and the coasts. Nonetheless, Janesville's population has risen over the same time, and our surrounding communities like South Beloit, Rockton, Roscoe, Clinton, Offordville, Brodhead, and Evansville have all grown.

    Beloit has invested heavily in cosmetics, and arguably the city is a much more visually appealing place than it was 30 years ago. That ought to be proof enough that aesthetics alone won't grow the city and raise our overall economic health. We need to be looking forward and pursuing opportunities to grow this city, and distinctly *not* looking backwards and inhibiting growth based upon visions from 30 years ago.

     
  • Mentor397 posted at 6:35 am on Wed, Apr 3, 2013.

    Mentor397 Posts: 1642

    Premature? Or necessary? Councilors don't make ... well, shouldn't make decisions in a vacuum. Who's to say that some of the comments weren't part of the decision making process? Given recent business-related decisions by the council, I don't know I'd call it hysteria either way.

    Still, why was the council even considering sticking to the plan? After nearly thirty years of sitting on the market, it's pretty apparent that plan wasn't working.

     
  • luckydog posted at 5:44 pm on Tue, Apr 2, 2013.

    luckydog Posts: 3636

    Well I guess all the hysteria from the right wing posters was premature. The system worked exactly like it was supposed to. The planning commission rightly raised some concerns and then the city council made their decision. The planning commission report is just a recommendation and the council can then do as they wish.

     

Print ads