Archives > Editorials

Print | E-mail | Comment (1 comment(s)) | Rate | Text Size

EDITORIAL: A tipping point for health care?


Published: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 11:41 AM CDT
If universal health care happens, business will lead the way.

WISCONSIN TURNED BACK the effort to include a form of universal health care in the state budgeting process, for a number of reasons.

First, the plan suddenly materialized in the Senate without proper introduction and hearings to allow the public and legislators to digest it all.

Second, sticker shock over the multi-billion dollar pricetag and tax increases doomed the plan.


Third, such major policy items do not belong as a mere add-on to the already complicated budget deliberations. Rather than press the issue as a hurry-up two-minute-drill, which bollixed up the budgeting process, the proposal deserved separate consideration to seek full attention and full participation by the public.

So the program crashed and burned. No surprise.

IF AMERICA ever is to embrace some form of universal health care, we would add this caveat: The impetus cannot seem to come from government.

Frankly, people just don't trust government that much.

We've said before, if the tipping point toward universal health care is reached, it will be the result of the private sector exhausting its patience with out-of-control costs. There are signs that point may be nearing.

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports on recommendations reached by the Committee for Economic Development. That's a group which includes current and retired chief executives of large corporations, Wall Street investment bankers and other high-powered business leaders, along with key academic figures.

The committee believes the present system is fatally flawed and cannot be rescued. Members do not propose reform; they propose revolution. They believe the system of providing health insurance through employers should be scrapped, and replaced with universal coverage.

The details are complicated but the conclusion is not: Employers cannot sustain a system with uncontrollable costs, and it must be changed before it completely and irreversibly breaks down and torpedoes the economy.

THERE'S A CERTAIN ring of truth, on the face of it. Businesses exist to drive the economy by creating products and jobs, not to manage social service networks. Undoubtedly, as costs and uncertainties soar, more and more businesses would love to jettison the headaches of providing and managing employee health care programs.

Obviously, that would be a bad thing unless some better system already were in place. So this committee's conclusion should be perceived as a red flag, suggesting patience is running low among some major national employers. America's leaders and politicians - not necessarily the same people - should get serious about creative solutions before a growing parade of employers throws people overboard without a health care safety net.

The impetus for change, and the shape of that change, must come with the private sector as senior partner, and with government as facilitator - not designer, and certainly not dictator. Heavy-handed, government-generated programming won't work. It failed in Wisconsin, as it failed in the 1990s in Washington.

Has the tipping point been reached? Maybe. This business committee's recommendation has the sound of a call to action.



  Next
  On this date

Article Rating

Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of beloitdailynews.com.

badgerpop wrote on Oct 25, 2007 8:10 AM:

" Your thinking has me puzzled. You say that the impetus for health care reform must come from business. Their bottom lines are being affected and that's why they're barking. It has little to do with the fact that there are almost 50 million uninsured Americans, most of them in working families, or that ER costs are escalating while access is getting choked off. And you say that business should be the "senior partner" in the reform, leaving the government to "facilitate." Given the recent business models in the US--IBM, which is now in major part Chinese, GM, Ford and Chrysler and other companies whose focus is more global than national and who have notable failures as business models lately, who, exactly, would design the health care system? And if business does it, where is the guarantee that the public's needs will be placed before those of business? In this climate, with American business looking to improve health care to improve the bottom line, why should I trust them to design anything national in scope? Just one reason, please. "

Submit a Comment

Login below to post your comment.
Not yet a member? Use the form below to register.
*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
*Address:
*City:
*State:
*Zip Code:
 
Return to: Editorials « | Home « | Top of Page ^
 
Today's Weather
Beloit, WI

Click for Larger View