Always be wary of their motives

Print Article

There are ways to address concerns without closing blinds on records.

LET'S REMEMBER: The nationwide push for police body cameras originated because bad - sometimes fatal - behavior by a few officers was captured on camera and broadcast across America.

Let's also remember that such behavior is rare. America's brave law enforcement officers should not be broadly tarnished by the misdeeds of the few.

Nevertheless, body cameras serve the public interest and often the officer's interest by providing the means to independently verify what took place at a given scene. When a police officer has performed poorly or illegally the camera records it. And when a police officer whose actions are being questioned performed within the law and applicable policies, the camera records and proves that, too.

THERE IS A MOVE in the Wisconsin Legislature to restrict access under the Public Records Law to footage from police body cameras. Advocates say the effort is intended to protect the privacy of people captured by video and to standardize police policies and procedures statewide. Supposedly, captured video involving deaths, injuries, seaches and arrests still could be public. Otherwise, video could be withheld.

We don't trust that. Any of it.

Here's our experience: Open a loophole that allows government to bury information and it will be used vigorously.

That's not to say individual privacy doesn't matter. Or that standardization is necessarily a bad thing.

But the records law already allows custodians to consider a balancing test to determine if the public's interest in disclosure is outweighed by other considerations, or vice versa, when it comes to handling information. And the records law permits redaction when portions of a record rightly should remain confidential, while the rest of the record ought to be disclosed. With video, presumably, that's called editing.

THE LEGISLATIVE MAJORITY in Wisconsin has shown its colors over and over. Given half an opportunity the majority would scrap the public's right to know many things. Citizens have ample reason not to trust these people on matters of transparency.

As far as the public is concerned, the main reason for body cams is accountability.

The next best reason, for officers, is to prove they acted appropriately when proof is required.

Both are best accomplished by keeping the transparency door open, while applying balancing tests already existing within the Public Records Law when the content requires discretion.

Print Article

Read More Editorials

Ideology first, justice second

July 16, 2018 at 9:24 am | At state and federal levels, courts increasingly reflect polarized times. WHEN JUDGE Brett Cavanaugh is confirmed to the U.S. Supreme Court - a rejection by the Senate seems highly unlikely - the ...

Comments

Read More

Make it all about the ones not there

July 09, 2018 at 9:30 am | Beloit needs its best and brightest to step up to stabilize school district. THE EVENTS OF last Tuesday evening - leading to three resignations from the Beloit school board - were unexpected, thou...

Comments

Read More

Holding office, keeping secrets

July 02, 2018 at 10:03 am | For too many officials, covering one's behind trumps transparency. A FEW WEEKS AGO a group of African American citizens including Dennis Baskin, a former Beloit School Board member, brought a prot...

Comments

Read More

Just another political stunt

July 02, 2018 at 10:03 am | Unproductive bickering is no substitute for sensible immigration policy. CONGRESSMAN MARK POCAN, who represents the Beloit area, is pushing a bill that would abolish the Immigration and Customs En...

Comments

Read More

Contact Us

(608) 365-8811
149 State Street
Beloit, WI 53511

©2018 Beloit Daily News Terms of Use Privacy Policy
X